Explicitly Ambiguous

Lesson on government health care

by Techievampire on Jun.29, 2009, under Special

I’m going to tell you a story. There was a couple waiting for the birth of a child. Last week the Mother was diagnosed with pre-eclampsia. The only treatment for her condition is abortion or delivery (by induction or c-section). For some reason, and I would be willing to bet it had to do with the expense of a c-section, the Doctors decided to wait.

Last night they thought the Mother was in labor.

The baby died today. Placental abruption probably related to the pre-eclampsia.

The mother had to endure a delivery after finding out her baby had died.

This isn’t fiction. This is the truth. This happened to my family today. The Father of the child is my cousin. He lives in England. My Aunt, the baby’s Grandmother and also a nurse, said the baby would have been old enough to have survived being induced or delivered by c-section last week. What is so heartbreaking is that if they’d been in the states they probably would have delivered the baby last week.

Do you really think that we in the states will be better off with government health care? If you do you’re worse than a fool!

If we allow those bastards in DC to create government health care they will end up limiting treatments and you’ll start hearing this kind of horror story repeatedly.

Do you really want this to happen to your daughter? Or you son? Do you want your Mother, Father, or Grandparents denied treatment because of their age?

For the love of GOD don’t be fooled into accepting what you’re being told by liars, thieves, and so-called social engineers.


Leave a Reply

Looking for something?

Use the form below to search the site:

Still not finding what you're looking for? Drop a comment on a post or contact us so we can take care of it!